On Thursday, Nancy Scott Degan who serves as chair of the Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary of the American Bar Association (ABA), explained to the Senate Judiciary why the ABA gave Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch the group’s highest rating, and what qualities an individual most possess to receive that qualification.
“Each each member of the standing committee then studied that final report and individually evaluated Judge Gorsuch using three possible rating categories, qualified, well qualified or not qualified,” told the committee.
Degan goes on to explain: “To merit a standing committee rating of well qualified, a Supreme Court nominee must be a preeminent member of the legal profession, have outstanding legal ability and exceptional breadth of experience and meet the very highest standards of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament. The rating of well qualified is reserved for those found to merit the committee’s strongest affirmative endorsement.”
“Having examined Judge Gorsuch through this lens, the standing committee members unanimously voted that he deserved the well qualified rating,” Degan concluded.
9.18.17 10:59 amFox News Highlights Media Bias In A CBS Report About Richard Cordray
“CBS Sunday Morning” didn’t disclose that four of the lawyers that it interviewed had ties to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
9.18.17 10:41 amAmericans Overwhelmingly Reject Internet Sales Tax Proposal
Two of three Americans said they oppose a sales tax in their state on items purchased online.
9.14.17 2:07 pmNew NRSC Ad Hits Claire McCaskill for Saying ‘Normal People’ Can Afford a Private Plane
It’s the latest gaffe for the vulnerable senator from Missouri.
8.24.17 3:00 pmIs Tim Cook Running For President?
The Apple CEO held presidential campaign style events in the pivotal states of Iowa and Ohio on Thursday.