Now Feinstein supports a filibuster because she does not agree with the nominee’s nomination.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said that to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee, “you really have to have something out there whether it’s gross moral turpitude or something that comes to the surface,” during in an interview on Face the Nation in 2006.
CBS’ Bob Schieffer asked Feinstein if she would support filibustering then-nominee Judge Samuel Alito, about whom Feinstein had previously expressed concern.
“I do not see the likelihood of a filibuster…I don’t see those kinds of egregious things emerging that would justify a filibuster,” Feinstein told Schieffer.
Feinstein went on to say: “I think when it comes to filibustering a Supreme Court appointment, you really have to have something out there, whether it’s gross moral turpitude or something that comes to the surface. Now I mean, this is a man I might disagree with. That doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be on the court.”
Today however, Feinstein has succumbed to pressure from outside progressive groups and will support a filibuster of Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch because she disagrees with Gorsuch’s nomination.
9.18.17 10:59 amFox News Highlights Media Bias In A CBS Report About Richard Cordray
“CBS Sunday Morning” didn’t disclose that four of the lawyers that it interviewed had ties to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
9.18.17 10:41 amAmericans Overwhelmingly Reject Internet Sales Tax Proposal
Two of three Americans said they oppose a sales tax in their state on items purchased online.
9.14.17 2:07 pmNew NRSC Ad Hits Claire McCaskill for Saying ‘Normal People’ Can Afford a Private Plane
It’s the latest gaffe for the vulnerable senator from Missouri.
8.24.17 3:00 pmIs Tim Cook Running For President?
The Apple CEO held presidential campaign style events in the pivotal states of Iowa and Ohio on Thursday.